Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
1.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 18(10-11): 522-531, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34491879

RESUMO

The objective of this paper was to estimate the inter-rater reliability of expert assessments of occupational exposures. An inter-rater reliability sub-study was conducted within a population-based case-control study of postmenopausal breast cancer. Detailed information on lifetime occupational histories was obtained from participants and two industrial hygienists assigned exposures to 185 jobs using a checklist of 293 agents. Experts rated exposure for each job-agent combination according to exposure status (unexposed/exposed), confidence that the exposure occurred (possible/probable/definite), intensity (low/medium/high), and frequency (% time per week). The statistical unit of observation was each job-agent assessment (185 jobs × 293 agents = 54,205 assessments per expert). Crude agreement, Gwet AC1/2 statistics, and Cohen's Kappa were used to estimate inter-rater agreement for confidence and intensity; for frequency, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used. The majority of job-agent combinations were evaluated by the two experts to be not exposed (crude agreement >98% of decisions). The degree of agreement between the experts for the confidence of exposure status was Gwet AC1/2 = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99-0.99), and for intensity, a Gwet AC2 = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99-0.99). For frequency, an ICC of 0.31 (95% CI: 0.26-0.35) was found. A sub-analysis restricted to job-agent combinations for which the two experts agreed on exposure status revealed a moderate agreement for confidence of exposure (Gwet AC2 = 0.66) and high agreement for intensity (Gwet AC2 = 0.96). For frequency, the ICC was 0.52 (95% CI: 0.47-0.57). A high level of inter-rater agreement was found for identifying exposures and for coding intensity, but agreement was lower for the coding of frequency of exposure.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Exposição Ocupacional , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Ocupações , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
J Intern Med ; 286(5): 583-595, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31361936

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most risk factors for lymphoma identified so far relate to immunosuppression, but its aetiology remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination is associated with lymphoma, overall and separately for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). METHODS: A cohort of 400 611 subjects born in the province of Québec, Canada, between 1970 and 1974 was used. Information on BCG vaccination was extracted from the Quebec BCG Vaccination Registry. Lymphomas cases were individuals who had ≥2 health encounters, medical visits or hospitalizations, for lymphoma within 2 months or who were identified through the Quebec Tumor Registry. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI), adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 178 335 (46.0%) subjects were BCG-vaccinated, and 1478 (0.38%) cases of lymphomas were ascertained. Amongst them, 922 were identified as NHL and 421 as HL. After adjustment, no association was observed between BCG vaccination and either lymphoma (any type) (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.96-1.11) or NHL (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.86-1.13). For HL, nonproportional hazards were observed. Before the age of 18, the risk of HL was elevated amongst vaccinated individuals (HR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.39-3.69). However after 18 years of age, no association was found (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.75-1.15). CONCLUSION: Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination may increase the risk of HL before 18 years of age, but residual confounding cannot entirely be excluded. Given the benefits of BCG vaccination, these results need to be reproduced in other populations before firm conclusions can be drawn.


Assuntos
Vacina BCG , Doença de Hodgkin/epidemiologia , Linfoma não Hodgkin/epidemiologia , Vacinação , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Doença de Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Humanos , Linfoma não Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Masculino , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
3.
Am J Epidemiol ; 186(7): 885-893, 2017 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28535174

RESUMO

We undertook a re-analysis of the Canadian data from the 13-country case-control Interphone Study (2001-2004), in which researchers evaluated the associations of mobile phone use with the risks of brain, acoustic neuroma, and parotid gland tumors. In the main publication of the multinational Interphone Study, investigators concluded that biases and errors prevented a causal interpretation. We applied a probabilistic multiple-bias model to address possible biases simultaneously, using validation data from billing records and nonparticipant questionnaires as information on recall error and selective participation. In our modeling, we sought to adjust for these sources of uncertainty and to facilitate interpretation. For glioma, when comparing those in the highest quartile of use (>558 lifetime hours) to those who were not regular users, the odds ratio was 2.0 (95% confidence interval: 1.2, 3.4). After adjustment for selection and recall biases, the odds ratio was 2.2 (95% limits: 1.3, 4.1). There was little evidence of an increase in the risk of meningioma, acoustic neuroma, or parotid gland tumors in relation to mobile phone use. Adjustments for selection and recall biases did not materially affect interpretation in our results from Canadian data.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/etiologia , Telefone Celular , Glioma/etiologia , Meningioma/etiologia , Neuroma Acústico/etiologia , Neoplasias Parotídeas/etiologia , Adulto , Viés , Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiologia , Canadá , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Campos Eletromagnéticos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Glioma/epidemiologia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Neoplasias Meníngeas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Meníngeas/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuroma Acústico/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Parotídeas/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
4.
Occup Environ Med ; 68(9): 631-40, 2011 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21659469

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine the associations of brain tumours with radio frequency (RF) fields from mobile phones. METHODS: Patients with brain tumour from the Australian, Canadian, French, Israeli and New Zealand components of the Interphone Study, whose tumours were localised by neuroradiologists, were analysed. Controls were matched on age, sex and region and allocated the 'tumour location' of their matched case. Analyses included 553 glioma and 676 meningioma cases and 1762 and 1911 controls, respectively. RF dose was estimated as total cumulative specific energy (TCSE; J/kg) absorbed at the tumour's estimated centre taking into account multiple RF exposure determinants. RESULTS: ORs with ever having been a regular mobile phone user were 0.93 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.18) for glioma and 0.80 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.96) for meningioma. ORs for glioma were below 1 in the first four quintiles of TCSE but above 1 in the highest quintile, 1.35 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.90). The OR increased with increasing TCSE 7+ years before diagnosis (p-trend 0.01; OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.47 in the highest quintile). A complementary analysis in which 44 glioma and 135 meningioma cases in the most exposed area of the brain were compared with gliomas and meningiomas located elsewhere in the brain showed increased ORs for tumours in the most exposed part of the brain in those with 10+ years of mobile phone use (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.13 to 6.94 for glioma). Patterns for meningioma were similar, but ORs were lower, many below 1.0. CONCLUSIONS: There were suggestions of an increased risk of glioma in long-term mobile phone users with high RF exposure and of similar, but apparently much smaller, increases in meningioma risk. The uncertainty of these results requires that they be replicated before a causal interpretation can be made.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiologia , Telefone Celular , Campos Eletromagnéticos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/epidemiologia , Doses de Radiação , Ondas de Rádio/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Algoritmos , Austrália/epidemiologia , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Glioma/epidemiologia , Humanos , Israel/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Neoplasias Meníngeas/epidemiologia , Meningioma/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
5.
Am J Epidemiol ; 166(9): 1005-14, 2007 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17690218

RESUMO

The International Agency for Research on Cancer recently classified inorganic lead as a probable carcinogen, while organic lead remained unclassifiable. Uncertainty persists because of limited epidemiologic evidence. The authors addressed the relation between occupational exposure to lead and the risk of 11 types of cancer among men in a case-control study conducted in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, in the 1980s. Incident cases (n = 3,730) and general population controls (n = 533) were interviewed to elicit information on job history and potential confounders. Expert chemists translated each job into a list of substances to which the subject had potentially been exposed. Exposure to lead was classified into three categories: organic lead (3% of subjects ever exposed), inorganic lead (17%), and lead in gasoline emissions (39%). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by logistic regression using two control groups: general population controls and cancer controls. Stomach cancer was associated with organic lead when the authors used population controls (odds ratio (OR) = 3.0, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2, 7.3) and cancer controls (OR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.1, 3.8) and with substantial exposure to lead in gasoline emissions when they used cancer controls (OR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.4, 5.9). There was no association with inorganic lead and little evidence for associations with other cancer types.


Assuntos
Chumbo/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Intervalos de Confiança , Coleta de Dados , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Análise de Regressão , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 14(5): 431-8, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16175048

RESUMO

Among men there is epidemiological evidence for an association between obesity and increased risk of renal cell carcinoma, colon cancer and adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. The evidence for other cancer sites remains inconsistent. We conducted a large population-based, multi-site, case-control study of environmental causes of cancer among males in Montreal, Canada. Among the many questionnaire items collected by interview were height and usual weight. We compared height, weight and body mass index (BMI) among individuals with 11 different cancer types (combined N=3016) and population-based controls (N=509). Linear regression was used to model the relationship of the disease status with each of three dependent continuous variables (height, weight and BMI), while adjusting for covariates. For most cancer groups, weight and BMI were lower than among population controls. Because of potential information bias and reverse causality bias, we focused on the comparisons among cancer types. The lowest BMI values were observed among men with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus, lung and stomach cancers. The highest BMIs were reported by men with prostate and kidney cancers, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Inconsistencies in the epidemiological literature on obesity and cancer risk could be related to the difficulties in obtaining unbiased reports of pre-disease weight and to publication bias.


Assuntos
Estatura , Peso Corporal , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/classificação , Neoplasias/fisiopatologia , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Fumar/epidemiologia
7.
Epidemiology ; 12(6): 695-700, 2001 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11679799

RESUMO

Epidemiologic evidence regarding the association between the consumption of green tea and lung cancer is limited and inconclusive, although experimental studies have shown consistently that tea preparations and tea polyphenols may inhibit the induction of a variety of cancers, including lung cancer. In this population-based case-control study, we examined the association between past consumption of green tea and the risk of lung cancer. We identified 649 incident cases of primary lung cancer among women diagnosed from February 1992 through January 1994 using the population-based Shanghai Cancer Registry. We randomly selected a control group of 675 women from the Shanghai Residential Registry, frequency-matched to the expected age distribution of the cases. Green tea consumption was ascertained through face-to-face interviews. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using unconditional logistic regression. Among nonsmoking women, consumption of green tea was associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer (OR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.45-0.93), and the risks decreased with increasing consumption. We found little association, however, among women who smoked (OR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.40-2.22). The inconsistency in the association between drinking tea and the risk of lung cancer reported in previous studies may in part be due to inadequate control of confounding of active smoking.


Assuntos
Flavonoides , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Fenóis , Polímeros , Chá , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , China/epidemiologia , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Polifenóis , Análise de Regressão , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Chá/química
9.
Am J Ind Med ; 39(6): 531-46, 2001 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11385637

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We conducted a population-based case-control study in Montreal, Canada, to explore associations between hundreds of occupational circumstances and several cancer sites, including colon. METHODS: We interviewed 497 male patients with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of colon cancer, 1514 controls with cancers at other sites, and 533 population-based controls. Detailed job histories and relevant potential confounding variables were obtained, and the job histories were translated by a team of chemists and industrial hygienists into a history of occupational exposures. RESULTS: We found that there was reasonable evidence of associations for men employed in nine industry groups (adjusted odds ranging from 1.1 to 1.6 per a 10-year increase in duration of employment), and in 12 job groups (OR varying from 1.1 to 1.7). In addition, we found evidence of increased risks by increasing level of exposures to 21 occupational agents, including polystyrene (OR for "substantial" exposure (OR(subst)) = 10.7), polyurethanes (OR(subst) = 8.4), coke dust (OR(subst) = 5.6), mineral oils (OR(subst) = 3.3), polyacrylates (OR(subst) = 2.8), cellulose nitrate (OR(subst) = 2.6), alkyds (OR(subst) = 2.5), inorganic insulation dust (OR(subst) = 2.3), plastic dusts (OR(subst) = 2.3), asbestos (OR(subst) = 2.1), mineral wool fibers (OR(subst) = 2.1), glass fibers (OR(subst) = 2.0), iron oxides (OR(subst) = 1.9), aliphatic ketones (OR(subst) = 1.9), benzene (OR(subst) = 1.9), xylene (OR(subst) = 1.9), inorganic acid solutions (OR(subst) = 1.8), waxes, polishes (OR(subst) = 1.8), mononuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (OR(subst) = 1.6), toluene (OR(subst) = 1.6), and diesel engine emissions (OR(subst) = 1.5). Not all of these effects are independent because some exposures occurred contemporaneously with others or because they referred to a group of substances. CONCLUSIONS: We have uncovered a number of occupational associations with colon cancer. For most of these agents, there are no published data to support or refute our observations. As there are few accepted risk factors for colon cancer, we suggest that new occupational and toxicologic studies be undertaken focusing on the more prevalent substances reported herein.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Canadá , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Exposição Ocupacional/classificação , Ocupações , Razão de Chances , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
10.
Am J Ind Med ; 38(6): 609-18, 2000 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11071683

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the role of workplace exposures on the risk of renal cell cancer. METHODS: A population-based case-control study was undertaken in Montreal to assess the association between hundreds of occupational circumstances and several cancer sites, including the kidney. A total of 142 male patients with pathologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma, 1900 controls with cancer at other sites and 533 population-based controls were interviewed. Detailed job histories and relevant data on potential confounders were obtained. A group of chemists-hygienists evaluated each job reported and translated them into a history of occupational exposures using a checklist of 294 substances. Multivariate logistic regression models using either population, cancer controls, or a pool of both groups were used to estimate odds ratios. RESULTS: There were some indications of excess risks among printers, nursery workers (gardening), aircraft mechanics, farmers, and horticulturists, as well as in the following industries: printing-related services, defense services, wholesale trade, and retail trade. Notwithstanding the low precision of many of the odds ratio estimates, the following workplace exposures showed some evidence of excess risk: chromium compounds, chromium (VI) compounds, inorganic acid solutions, styrene-butadiene rubber, ozone, hydrogen sulphide, ultraviolet radiation, hair dust, felt dust, jet fuel engine emissions, jet fuel, aviation gasoline, phosphoric acid and inks. CONCLUSIONS: For most of these associations there exist no, or very little, previous data. Some associations provide suggestive evidence for further studies.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Renais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exposição Ocupacional , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
11.
Int J Cancer ; 87(6): 874-9, 2000 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10956400

RESUMO

In 1979, a hypothesis-generating, population-based case-control study was undertaken in Montreal, Canada, to explore the association between occupational exposure to 294 substances, 130 occupations and industries, and various cancers. Interviews were carried out with 3, 630 histologically confirmed cancer cases, of whom 257 had rectal cancer, and with 533 population controls, to obtain detailed job history and data on potential confounders. The job history of each subject was evaluated by a team of chemists and hygienists and translated into occupational exposures. Logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, education, cigarette smoking, beer consumption, body mass index, and respondent status were performed using population controls and cancer controls, e.g., 1,295 subjects with cancers at sites other than the rectum, lung, colon, rectosigmoid junction, small intestine, and peritoneum. We present here the results based on cancer controls. The following substances showed some association with rectal cancer: rubber dust, rubber pyrolysis products, cotton dust, wool fibers, rayon fibers, a group of solvents (carbon tetrachloride, methylene chloride, trichloroethylene, acetone, aliphatic ketones, aliphatic esters, toluene, styrene), polychloroprene, glass fibers, formaldehyde, extenders, and ionizing radiation. The independent effect of many of these substances could not be disentangled as many were highly correlated with each other.


Assuntos
Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Retais/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Poeira/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ocupações , Razão de Chances , Quebeque , Análise de Regressão
12.
Occup Environ Med ; 57(5): 325-34, 2000 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10769298

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe the relation between oesophageal cancer and many occupational circumstances with data from a population based case-control study. METHODS: Cases were 99 histologically confirmed incident cases of cancer of the oesophagus, 63 of which were squamous cell carcinomas. Various control groups were available; for the present analysis a group was used that comprised 533 population controls and 533 patients with other types of cancer. Detailed job histories were elicited from all subjects and were translated by a team of chemists and hygienists for evidence of exposure to 294 occupational agents. Based on preliminary results and a review of literature, a set of 35 occupational agents and 19 occupations and industry titles were selected for this analysis. Logistic regression analyses were adjusted for age, birthplace, education, respondent (self or proxy), smoking, alcohol, and beta-carotene intake. RESULTS: Sulphuric acid and carbon black showed the strongest evidence of an association with oesophageal cancer, particularly squamous cell carcinoma. Other substances showed excess risks, but the evidence was more equivocal-namely chrysotile asbestos, alumina, mineral spirits, toluene, synthetic adhesives, other paints and varnishes, iron compounds, and mild steel dust. There was considerable overlap in occupational exposure patterns and results for some of these substances may be mutually confounded. None of the occupations or industry titles showed a clear excess risk; the strongest hints were for warehouse workers, food services workers, and workers from the miscellaneous food industry. CONCLUSIONS: The data provide some support for an association between oesophageal cancer and a handful of occupational exposures, particularly sulphuric acid and carbon black. Many of the associations found have never been examined before and warrant further investigation.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/induzido quimicamente , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Carbono/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Indústrias , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Ocupações , Razão de Chances , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Ácidos Sulfúricos/efeitos adversos
13.
Lung Cancer ; 27(1): 3-18, 2000 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10672779

RESUMO

A meta-analysis was carried out to calculate a pooled estimate of relative risk of lung cancer following exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and to determine whether there was any heterogeneity in the pooled estimates according to selected characteristics of the studies. A total of 35 case-control and five cohort studies providing quantitative estimates of the association between lung cancer and exposure to ETS published between January 1981 and March 1999 were identified. Using fixed- and random-effects models, we calculated pooled estimates of relative risk for exposure to ETS from subjects' parents (during childhood), spouses, and coworkers. As well, we investigated whether the pooled estimates of relative risk varied by study location, degree of control of potential confounding variables, proportion of cases confirmed histologically, proportion of surrogate respondents, nonresponse rates, and year of publication. The relative risk of lung cancer among non smoking women ever exposed to ETS from their husbands' smoking was 1.20 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.29). The pooled relative risk was 1.19 (95% CI: 1.10-1.29) for case-control studies and 1.29 (95% CI: 1.04-1.62) for cohort studies. In various subgroup and meta-regression analyses, we found no statistically significant differences by selected characteristics of the studies. In addition, we found that the risk of lung cancer increased consistently with increasing levels of exposure. The 11 studies reporting relative risks among male non smokers yielded a pooled relative risk of 1.48 (95% CI: 1.13-1.92) for ever exposed to ETS, and the relative risk of lung cancer for ever being exposed to ETS at work was a 1.16 (95% CI: 1.05-1.28). These results are consistent with the hypothesis that exposure to ETS increases the risk of lung cancer. While there may be alternative explanations to the data, it is more likely that the observed association is not an artifact and that ETS causes lung cancer in non smokers.


Assuntos
Exposição Ambiental , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco
14.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 25(4): 309-16, 1999 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10505656

RESUMO

In an evaluation of the association between exposure to indoor air pollution from Chinese-style cooking and the risk of lung cancer, epidemiologic and experimental studies were reviewed. The 9 case-referent studies that were identified showed consistent positive associations between the risk of lung cancer and a variety of indices of exposure to indoor air pollution arising from Chinese-style cooking. Three experimental studies showed that volatile emissions from oils heated in woks are mutagenic in several in vitro short-term test systems. Several toxic agents, including some accepted or suspected carcinogens, have been detected in the emissions of the heated cooking oils. While experimental data support the epidemiologic data, it may be premature to conclude that the association is causal. However, simple precautions can be taken to reduce the risk in the event that exposure to indoor air pollution arising from Chinese-style cooking is indeed a cause of lung cancer.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados , Culinária , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Óleos de Plantas , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Fatores de Risco
15.
Epidemiology ; 9(1): 48-55, 1998 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9430268

RESUMO

The role of occupational substances as stomach carcinogens has not been well investigated. In 1979, a population-based case-control study was undertaken in Montreal to explore the possible association between hundreds of occupational circumstances and several cancer sites, including the stomach. In total, 250 male patients with pathologically confirmed stomach cancer, 2,289 male controls with cancers at other sites, and 533 population-based male controls were interviewed to obtain detailed job histories and relevant data on potential confounders. Job histories were evaluated by expert chemists and hygienists and translated into a history of occupational exposures. On the basis of results of preliminary analyses and literature review, we selected 16 occupations and industries and 32 substances for in-depth multivariate analysis using the pooled group of cancer and population controls. We found elevated risks for excavators and pavers, forestry workers, electric and electronic workers, motor transport workers, and food industry employees. The substances that were most plausibly associated with gastric cancer were: crystalline silica, leaded gasoline, grain dust, lead dust, zinc dust, hydraulic fluids, and glycol ethers. The paucity of data documenting the association between most of these occupational circumstances and gastric cancer precludes drawing firm conclusions.


Assuntos
Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Intervalos de Confiança , Humanos , Lactente , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Razão de Chances , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Gástricas/etiologia
16.
J Cancer Educ ; 12(2): 114-20, 1997.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9229275

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Identification by medical providers of families at higher risks for breast cancer relies on patients' recollection of family histories. While patients seem to report the occurrences of breast cancer in their first-degree relatives accurately, little is known about the precision of reports of ages at diagnosis of cancers in relatives, one of the most revealing clues with regard to hereditary transmission. Moreover, the methods used in previous studies to elicit the family reports render their applicability to the medical setting questionable. METHODS: Confirmatory pathology records were sought and compared with reports of breast cancer events among 125 first-degree relatives by 68 women with breast cancer and 37 women without the disease. RESULTS: Sixty-seven (90.5%) of the reports of the occurrence of breast cancer in relatives by affected women and 32 (97.0%) of those by unaffected women were accurate. Women reporting several affected relatives often overreported the presence of breast cancer events. Nearly 89% of the reports of age at diagnosis were correct within five years. The average error in the reports was 2.0 years. The precision of reports of age at diagnosis did not differ according to the educational level of the proband, the age at which the relative had been diagnosed, or the type of relative affected. However, the mean error in reporting the age at diagnosis of relatives was significantly larger among probands 70 years old or older compared with younger probands. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that relying on reports by patients with and without breast cancer should not critically affect the assessment of breast-cancer risks for family members. Nevertheless, verification by examination of pathology records is justified when decisions about patient management and referral for genetic counseling are made based on reports of several affected relatives.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Anamnese , Rememoração Mental , Adulto , Idade de Início , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Quebeque , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
17.
Diabetes Care ; 20(5): 767-72, 1997 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9135940

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the association between Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination and IDDM development in two different case-control series (A and B) in Montreal. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Case-control series A comprised 93 IDDM cases and 2,903 control subjects who participated in a community-based tuberculin reactivity survey and who belonged to the same birth cohorts and areas of residence as the IDDM cases, Case-control series B comprised 249 IDDM cases and 431 age- and sex-matched friends and neighborhood control subjects. RESULTS: In series A, the BCG vaccination prevalence among cases and control subjects was 21.5% (95% CI 13.2-29.8%) and 22.3% (95% CI 20.8-23.8%), respectively. The odds ratio (OR) for IDDM associated with BCG vaccination was 1.09 (95% CI 0.62-1.91), after adjusting for the birth cohorts and areas of residence. The vaccination prevalence in series B was 17.7% (95% CI 13.0-22.4%) among cases and 15.1% (95% CI 11.7-18.5%) among control subjects. The OR for IDDM due to BCG vaccination was 1.26 (95% CI 0.79-2.02), taking into account the matched sets. Only one case (3.3%) from series B who had been vaccinated at birth was diagnosed by age 5, compared with 52 cases (24.5%) who had not been vaccinated (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The lower proportion of birth-vaccinated IDDM cases diagnosed at a very young age, compared with nonvaccinated cases, possibly reflects a temporary boost of the immune functions after vaccination. However, as a whole, results from these analyses fail to support a protective role of BCG vaccination against juvenile-onset IDDM.


Assuntos
Vacina BCG , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Demografia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Prevalência , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , População Urbana
18.
Am J Ind Med ; 30(3): 285-92, 1996 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8876796

RESUMO

Although it has been hypothesized that carbon black exposure may carry an excess risk of lung cancer, evidence to date is insufficient to assess the hypothesis properly. The relationship between workplace exposure to carbon black and lung cancer risk was examined in a population-based case-control study carried out in Montreal, Canada. Detailed job histories were elicited from 857 incident cases with histologically confirmed lung cancer as well as from 1,360 cancer controls and 533 population controls. Job histories were evaluated by a team of hygienists and chemists for evidence of exposure to a host of occupational substances, including carbon black. Logistic regression analyses adjusting for smoking and other nonoccupational and occupational potential confounders suggested no significant increase in risk with relatively low exposure to carbon black. Some increase in risk for all lung cancers was apparent with relatively high exposure using cancer controls (OR = 2.17; 95% CI = 0.95-4.91) and population controls (OR = 1.52; 95% CI = 0.58-3.97). Individuals with relatively high exposure had a significantly greater risk of oat-cell carcinoma using either control series (OR = 5.05; 95% CI = 1.72-14.87 using cancer controls and OR = 4.82; 95% CI = 1.36-17.02 using population controls). These results provide some evidence for an association between exposure to carbon black and lung cancer.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/efeitos adversos , Carbono/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Ocupações/classificação , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/etiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Intervalos de Confiança , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Ocupações/estatística & dados numéricos , Razão de Chances , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo
19.
Epidemiology ; 6(2): 184-6, 1995 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7742408

RESUMO

We examined pathology records to determine the accuracy of reports of breast cancer among 125 first-degree relatives by 414 breast cancer cases and 429 population-based controls. Cases who reported only one affected relative tended to overreport the occurrence of breast cancer to a slightly larger extent (4%) than controls (3%). One-third of reports by cases with at least two affected relatives were erroneous, compared with none in the control group. Both cases and controls committed absolute errors of approximately 2 years when reporting the age at diagnosis of relatives. These results indicate that some recall bias is introduced when self-reports of breast cancer occurrence in first-degree relatives are used in case-control studies.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Variações Dependentes do Observador
20.
J Am Coll Nutr ; 14(1): 37-45, 1995 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7706608

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Since the 1960's, marked sociocultural and economic changes have affected lifestyle, religious practices, and family structure among French Canadians in Quebec. Recent nutritional assessment was unavailable, despite indications of change. METHODS: A survey was carried out in 1988 in a representative sample living in Greater Montreal, to obtain current data on food habits, nutrient intakes and sociodemographic factors, using interviewer-administered questionnaires and seven-day food records. RESULTS: Some 845 families (1450 individuals from different age groups) were studied in two phases: summer/fall and winter/spring. Mean household size in the study population was 2.7. Among adults, extremes of educational level were observed, with 33% having elementary school only and 28% having completed university. On average, each household spent $CAN 89.90 a week for food, $26.00 for tobacco, and $13.50 for alcohol. Breakfast was eaten regularly by 90% of subjects while 96% ate lunch and 99% ate dinner. Morning snacks were consumed by 36% and afternoon snacks were taken by 50%. Milk was consumed with breakfast by 24% of respondents, with lunch by 19%, and with dinner by 24%. On weekdays, 81% of subjects ate their main meals at home, while on weekends this figure was 95%. Time spent for meals varied by meal, and was slightly longer on weekends. Specialty diets, including vegetarianism, were followed by 7% of the study subjects, while 22% adhered to health-related diets. CONCLUSIONS: The food record analyses revealed adequate nutrient intakes overall in relation to the 1990 Canadian Recommended Nutrient Intakes, although further investigation is needed before addressing dietary quality in specific age-sex groups. Protein comprised 16% of energy, fat 38%, and carbohydrates composed 45% or 46% for males and females, respectively. Subsequent analyses will evaluate nutrient intakes in relation to health and sociodemographic indicators in this population.


Assuntos
Comportamento Alimentar , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Bebidas , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dieta , Registros de Dieta , Feminino , Preferências Alimentares , França/etnologia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Política Nutricional , Quebeque , Estações do Ano , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...